I v/s I
Atheist v/s priest
Are you an atheist, a non believer who holds truth above his head and talk about the non existence of Supreme Being, one who defines every movement of his life in terms of scientific findings and through laws of physics where the activities gets recorded under the heuristics of mass-body-space-time-speed and distance? Are you a kind of reductionist who infers the happenings with a scientific eye?
Are you that lonely priest in this holy world who believes in the control of supreme power and a mere mortal, an organism who opens up in the arms of some vital force omnipotent but same time hard to unearth in scientific theories?
Is it really possible for a mortal mind to exist without faith?
It’s hard for me to judge as to who am I, a believer of implicit things having lesser reality (evidence) but more belief associated with it or someone who gets fascinated to the pragmatic findings of scientific evolution.
On the other hand, every believer’s view is based on statements less factual and more assumed by paralyzing their mindset with societal knowledge without challenging the authority of the edification passed. From school till date, every social organism is made to belief in the good v/s the bad, god v/s evil and not allowed to question on anything. Is it really the faith or belief to not to question and comply with the learning’s institutionalized or is it the absence of intelligence and intellect to think and raise doubts about laws written in the past?
Is assumption the only way to overlook the findings by deduction? Or is it the complexities of the nature around that makes humans contrive tribulations through myths and erroneous beliefs but not through facts, mathematical figures and equations? Does science itself gives explicit picture to the researches made about the universe without assumptions or only through inference?
And my struggle to find answers to such question continues…